Lauren Pazienza is a beautiful and talented actress. She has a very strong sense of style and grace and she is also very witty. Her acting career started when she was just a teenager and she has starred in several movies. Now she is in her thirties and has a good job. However, she has been involved in some serious incidents.
Defendant’s work history
Table of Contents
In the courtroom of the day, one of the most interesting and interactive defendants is the one wearing the striped suit. There is a lot of high energy talk going on, especially in the presence of a competent and well tasked defense attorney.
The defendant was also known for the egregious crime of bribing a New York City environmental control board inspector. One of the most important factors in this case was defendant’s inability to avow his innocence.
Despite a good deal of prodding, defendant was not willing to acknowledge his guilt and took a plea deal. However, he was still a convicted felon in the grand scheme of things.
While a number of pretrial motions were heard, it is clear that defendant was not the only one in his boat. After a fair amount of cajoling, defendant was forced to accept a $2,000 check.
It should be noted that this was the same amount of cash that he was able to scrounge up from his previous employers. Interestingly, the aforementioned defendant did not take out his checkbook for the rest of the night. This is in stark contrast to the case a few weeks earlier, when he was still on the payroll.
Defendant’s psychological state
If you are defending a defendant in a criminal case, you will need to know his or her psychological state. To do this, you will need to ask open-ended questions, and review all of the medical records and other legal documents that are available.
Defendants with mental disorders have impulsive behavior, problems within neurological structures, and aggressive behaviors. They also have problems with their decision-making capacity and the ability to make rational decisions.
Psychiatric expert testimony has become routine in many legal cases. Experts testify about a defendant’s character traits and past acts. However, this type of testimony has caused a great deal of controversy.
The defense argues that there is no scientific basis for the assertion that a defendant is mentally ill. In fact, all but a few states in the U.S. permit the insanity defense. But, the Supreme Court has made the issue a focal point in recent cases.
Before a psychiatrist can give an opinion about a patient’s state, he or she must first determine the reason for the referral. Next, they must look into the defendant’s behavior before, during, and after the commission of the offense. Finally, they must consider the possibility that the patient might be malingering.
Defendant’s relationship with her fiance
The question was whether or not the defendant had an equally satisfying relationship with her soon to be husband. Several years of flirtations, mishaps, and mutual sex have left their mark on both the sexes.
There was a time when the pair sported the most elusive of escorts, but the tidbits of truth in a few short months has left the door open for a reunion worthy of the Queen of Sheba. Having said that, the most important component of the sex is still in the same house. In an effort to keep the romance alive, a number of mishaps ensued.
It was a matter of time before the dust settled. Until a number of errants were thrown on their heels, the couple was off to a good start.
Despite the tumult, the pair was reaffirmed by a second marriage. They are now living in the same house. A few apologies, a few regrets and a few well wishes later, the sex aficionados have reemerged.
Defendant’s behavior after the incident
If you are dealing with a potential client who may be a criminal defendant, you need to be sure to look into the defendant’s behavior after the incident.
This includes the person’s emotions and perceptions, as well as his or her cognition and biological functioning. In order to do so, you should ask the defendant to describe his or her behavior in detail.
For example, if the offense was a shooting, then the psychiatrist should ask the defendant to describe how he or she was feeling during the incident. They should also ask if the defendant was intoxicated at the time of the incident.
Then they should inquire about the individual’s perception and cognition, as well as his or her social and occupational functioning. Finally, the psychiatrist should try to get a full account of the event through open-ended questions.
